What is the issue?
There is no definite solution yet on what to feed children in anganwadis, to address poor child nutrition in India.
What is the nutrition scenario?
- The National Family Health Survey-4 (NFHS-4) shows a drop in underweight and stunted children under five years of age.
- But the absolute numbers are still high.
- Around 35% children are underweight and 38% are stunted in that age group.
- Many children have died of malnutrition in India.
- The body mass index of around 22% women aged 15-49 indicates chronic energy deficiency.
- NFHS data show several States performing worse than the national average.
- 'Nourishing India', NITI Aayog's recent report, refers to acute malnutrition levels of about 25% in some States.
What is the recent tussle?
- Minister of Women and Child Development has recently made a proposal in this regard.
- It suggested replacing ready-to-eat food as take-home dry ration with energy-dense nutrient packets.
- It suggests offering packaged/processed fortified mixes to children.
- These can be in powdered form and mixed with food for anganwadi beneficiaries.
- Instead of take-home ration, 30 such packets could be dispatched to a beneficiary for a month through the postal department.
- However, hot-cooked meal is put forth by many as unsubstitutable to address poor child nutrition.
- These include the officials of the Ministry themselves.
What are the Nutrition Council's decisions?
- The National Council on Nutrition (NCN) has unanimously rejected the proposal to replace ready-to-eat food.
- Existing practice of hot cooked meals for children (3-6 years) age group would be continued.
- Take-home ration (THR) would be continued for children (6 months-3 years), and pregnant women and lactating mothers.
- This would be as decided by the State governments in conformity with
- the National Foods Security Act, 2013
- the Supplementary Nutrition Rules, 2017
- It was also agreed to involve mothers of anganwadi beneficiaries.
- They would take part in preparation of meals, to ensure quality and encourage public participation.
- The council has also directed that pilot projects be conducted in 10 select districts on cash transfers instead of take-home rations.
- The Minster has however opposed the idea saying that there is no guarantee that beneficiaries would use the money for food.
What should be done?
- Tinkering with the existing ICDS scheme (Anganwadi Services Scheme) is seen to be fraught with danger.
- Attempts to substitute meals or rations with factory-made nutrients will inject commercialisation into a key mission.
- This could upset the fundamental nutritional basis of the scheme.
- Instead, anganwadi workers have to be empowered to ensure proper delivery of existing services.
- Provision of physical infrastructure and funding, besides closer monitoring of anganwadi services, could be ensured.
- Local self-help groups could be engaged to ensure “region-location based recipe and dietary diversification.”
- Theoretically, the mission covers every child, but in practice it is not accessible to all, and this needs redressal.
Source: The Hindu
Quick Fact
POSHAN Abhiyaan (National Nutrition Mission)
- POSHAN Abhiyaan envisages undertaking activities to improve
- the service delivery system
- capacity building of front line functionaries
- community engagement for better nutritional outcomes
- An Executive Committee is set up under the Chairpersonship of Secretary, Ministry of Women & Child Development.
- It provides policy support and guidance to States/ UTs from time to time.
- A National Council on India’s Nutrition Challenges is set up under the Chairpersonship of Vice Chairman, NITI Aayog.
National Council on India’s Nutrition Challenges
- The National Council on India’s Nutrition Challenges is headed by Vice-Chairman of the NITI Aayog.
- It was constituted to provide policy directions to address nutritional challenges in the country.
- It ensures effective coordination and convergence between Ministries which have a sectoral responsibility for the nutrition challenge.
- It is also tasked to review programmes on a quarterly basis.