What is the issue?
Despite challenges, agricultural investment support scheme could be implemented as an alternate for the farm loan waiver at an all-India level.
What is the income support model of Telangana?
- Telangana’s Rythu Bandhu Scheme (RBS) has a grant component of Rs 4,000 per acre per farmer for one season (kharif/rabi).
- In a year, an eligible farmer will receive Rs 8,000 of grant for crop production that includes purchasing of critical inputs, irrigation and hiring of farm labour.
- The scheme covers 1.42 crore acres in the 31 districts of the state, and every farmer owning land is eligible.
- The objective is to help the farmer meet a major part of his expenses on seed, fertiliser, pesticide, and field preparation. (farm inputs)
- The Telangana government has allocated about Rs 120 billion to target 5.83 million farmers under RBS in 2018-19.
- The fiscal burden of the scheme, if implemented by the Centre at an all-India level, will cost around Rs 600-700 billion per year.
What are the challenges in rolling out at an all-India level?
- Identification - Identification of the right beneficiary could be a daunting task to roll out the scheme, as 90-110 million smallholder farmers in India have joint land records.
- Also, these smallholder farmers are yet to digitise their land records on a centralised land revenue management information system.
- So, land record modernisation across India, especially in eastern and north-east regions, entails a huge spending on account of state governments.
- Monitoring - Since agriculture is a state subject, implementing states for RBS need to come out with an execution plan.
- Checks and balances should plug the loopholes on whether the beneficiaries actually use the grant amount for cultivation or divert the funds to other activities.
- Although RBS is viewed as quasi-universal basic income (QUBI) support to farmers, the grant support provided is specifically targeted for investment support in agriculture.
- Thus, apart from supporting farm inputs, the government still needs to ensure reasonable market price for those produce or else the produce should be covered under the price support scheme.
- Fiscal Burden - Cost-sharing between the Centre and states should be in place before rolling out RBS.
- It is estimated that the cost to cover only small and marginal farmers would be to the tune of 1.4 trillion per year based on net sown area in India.
- The average cost of production and cropping intensity across the implementing states will give a clearer picture of budget estimate for RBS.
- Coverage - Since the scheme covers only farmers who have land records, it leaves out tenant cultivators, who grow crops on land they don’t own and is taken on lease.
- Therefore, there should be some alternative mechanism to cover tenant farmers across the country.
What should be done?
- The NITI Aayog needs to execute RBS effectively, wherein it needs to devise a mechanism on how can RBS tie-up the existing market infrastructures and eventually function in unison.
- Measures like eNAM, NABARD promoted grant-cum-loan based agri-business, electronic procurement system and Direct Benefits Transfer, revamped crop and weather insurance schemes can be linked with RBS.
- Also, farmer producer companies (FPCs) can be an effective channel of implementing RBS.
- The objective of FPC is to organize farmers into a collective to improve their bargaining strength in the market.
- RBS implementation can be effective if FPCs can be targeted to identify the beneficiaries and channelise the stipulated grant support to farmers via FPCs.
- Improved technology support can also augment the identification process with the help of domain expert and supporting resource institutions.
- Thus, execution of RBS at the national level should be a concerted effort and converge existing government programmes, schemes and infrastructures essential to mitigate agrarian distress.
- Else, it won’t be a one-stop solution either to farmer distress or to the burden of farm loan waivers.
Source: Financial Express
