What is the issue?
- There is revival in talks among the government circles for FDI in multi-brand retail.
- However, time is said to have passed for a policy decision on this front.
What was the earlier reform?
- In 2013, India rolled out a renewed foreign direct investment (FDI) policy in multi-brand retail.
- But the policy threw up so many conditions such as local sourcing, state-wise decision-making, investment modalities, etc.
- Consequently, Walmart and Bharti group terminated their seven-year-old partnership for retail business in the country.
- The requirement of sourcing 30% of the goods from domestic companies was one of the reasons.
- Also, Wal-Mart Stores was to find a local partner to own 49% of business under the FDI regulations to set up multi-brand outlets.
- The break up put an end to the American major Wal-Mart’s dream of tapping the buying power of a rising middle class in India.
Why is the time unripe now?
- Four years from then, the debate on FDI in multi-brand retail is back on the policy table.
- But experts are of the opinion that the time for FDI in multi-brand retail has passed.
- This is because, with the earlier unfriendly investor policy, the multinationals have either moved on to other business models or other geographies.
- Businesses are unlikely to shift to a new model unless the terms are lucrative.
- Besides, fast changing scenario in terms of technology is another reason.
- Ex: Online shopping is gaining foot and has a huge potential in the coming years.
- Businesses thus consider investing in this a better option than other expensive physical infrastructure for multi-brand retail.
- Businesses prefer the segments that is the easiest to operate and where returns are promising.
What lies ahead?
- Opening the FDI talk at this juncture looks less significant.
- However, if the government views it for employment generation, then the above concerns must be addressed before any policy formulations.
Source: Business Standar
