Enumerate the advantages and disadvantages of National Medical Commission Bill, 2017. (200 words)
Refer – The Indian Express
Enrich the answer from other sources, if the question demands.
IAS Parliament 7 years
KEY POINTS
Features of NMC Bill, 2017
· The new NMC bill provides for the replacement of the MCI, with a 25-member National Medical Commission (NMC).
· A Medical Advisory Council should be constituted by the central government to advise and make recommendations to the NMC.
· The council will include members from each state and Union Territory, chairperson of the UGC, and director of the NAAC.
· It proposed for a National Licentiate Examination for MBBS graduates to grant licences for medical practice, and for admission to postgraduate courses.
· It also allows practitioners of homoeopathy and Indian systems of medicine to prescribe allopathic medicine upon completion of a “bridge” course.
Advantages
· The existing Indian Medical Council (IMC) Act does not call for diversity of backgrounds in its members.
· Self-regulation alone does not work because, any group consisting entirely of members from the same profession is unlikely to promote and protect public interest over and above their own self-interest.
· The wider representation in the proposed regulatory body will promote and protect health care services.
· The proposed licentiate exams will encourage standard doctors.
· The existing IMC is elected by medical practitioners across the country, whereas, the members of the proposed NMC are mostly nominated.
· Thus, the new NMC will eliminate the possibility of use of money power in elections.
· In election process, use of money gives advantage to private management-sponsored candidates getting over-represented.
· Since the number of private medical colleges is increasing, the over-representation of private medical college representatives would affect the role and responsibilities of the MCI.
Disadvantages
· It will make the system prone to corruption because, the members are mostly nominated, not elected.
· So, in keeping with global standards, and as is the practice in other educational fields in our country (AICTE and UGC), regulatory structure should be run by persons selected through a transparent mechanism rather than by the current process of election and nominations.
· It will cripple the functioning of medical professionals by making them completely answerable to the bureaucracy and non-medical administrators.
· Unscientific mixing of systems and empowering of other practitioners through bridge courses will only pave the way for substandard doctors and substandard medical practice.
· The licentiate examination will create additional hurdles for the backward communities.
· It is an anti-poor bill with pro-private management clauses which aims to allowing private medical colleges to increase undergraduate and postgraduate seats on their own.
· The private medical colleges will be allowed to decide the fee for 60 per cent of their seats, while previously it was 15 per cent.
· This will increase the cost of medical education.
· Under the new bill, medical colleges will need permission only once for establishment and recognition, with no need for annual renewal.
RIAZ KHAN 7 years
pliz review
IAS Parliament 7 years
Avoid lengthy introductions. Otherwise a good attempt. Keep writing.
Vishwanth Adhepalli 7 years
Please review and give your suggestions. Thanks in advance!
IAS Parliament 7 years
Well written. Keep
writing.