While deterring defections, does the Anti-defection law also suppress healthy intra-party debate and dissent? Analyse.
IAS Parliament 8 years
KEY POINTS
Necessity of Anti-defection law
· Up to 1967 the cases of defection were 400 which subsequently rose to a figure of 500 odd cases of defection, in which 118 were by the persons who exercised a great amount of power and responsibility such as the Ministers or Ministers of State.
· Therefore, in 1967, a committee was formed to deal with the issue of defection.
· Subsequently Anti Defection law was framed –
· To combat political defections
· To provide stability to the government by preventing shifts of party allegiance.
· To ensure that candidates elected with party support remain loyal to the party policies.
· To promote party discipline.
Disadvantages of Anti-defection law
· By preventing parliamentarians from changing parties, it reduces the accountability of the government to the Parliament and the people.
· Interferes with the member’s freedom of speech and expression by curbing dissent against party policies.
· It restricts representatives from voicing the concerns of their voters in opposition to the official party position.
· Defections are mostly decided by Speaker, who is usually a member of the ruling party or coalition.
Solutions
· The issue of disqualification should be decided by the President/ Governor on the binding advice of the Election Commission.
· The term “voluntarily giving up membership” to be comprehensively defined.
· Political parties should limit issuance of whips to instances only when the government is in danger.