Click here for Part I
What is the issue?
The proposal to amend the RTI Act, 2005 has raised dissent at many levels with call for a roll back of amendments.
What are the concerns?
- The changes would erode the independence of the Information Commissions at the national and state levels.
- The Central government seeks control over the tenure, salary and allowances of the functionaries.
- These include Chief and other Information Commissioners at Centre, and State Chief Information Commissioners.
- It would eliminate the parity they currently have with the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners.
- Thus, the equivalence with a Supreme Court judge in matters of pay, allowances and conditions of service would also be disturbed.
- Also, the Supreme Court has held right to information as being integral to the right to free expression under Article 19.
- Thus, weakening the transparency law would go against this guarantee.
What are the existing shortcomings?
- 1) The information commissions get little official support to fill the vacancies.
- Evidently, Central Information Commission has over 23,500 pending appeals and complaints.
- 2) The law envisaged that voluntary disclosure would reduce the need to file an application.
- But many State departments are ignoring the requirement to publish information suo motu.
- 3) Fines are rarely imposed for any shortfall in compliance.
- So officers are giving incomplete, vague or unconnected information to applicants with impunity.
- 4) Easier payment of application fee and a reliable online system to apply for information are missing.
What could be done?
- RTI Act has fared well in empowering the citizen, by weakening the colonial legacy of secretive government.
- Filling up the vacancies and bringing in efficiency is the need of the hour.
- Better compliance by government departments and agencies should be ensured.
- Also, the scope of RTI could also be extended to more institutions influencing official policy.
Source: The Hindu
