0.2100
7667766266
x

Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Teachers' Cadre) Bill

iasparliament Logo
July 04, 2019

Why in news?

The Lok Sabha has passed the Central Educational Institutions (Reservations in Teachers’ Cadre) Bill-2019, replacing an earlier ordinance.

Why was an ordinance passed?

  • In 2018, the UGC announced that an individual department (instead of the institution) will be considered as the base unit to calculate the number of teaching posts to be reserved.
  • This was based on an Allahabad High Court order from 2017.
  • This led to a move from the 200-point roster system to a 13-point roster.
  • [The 200-point roster system considers the university as the unit rather than the 13-point roster system which considers department as the unit.]
  • The Supreme Court rejected the review petition by the government on the UGC directive.
  • So the government passed an Ordinance.
  • According to the ordinance, the system will revert to a 200-point roster.
  • This was also endorsed by student and teacher organisations across the country.

What is the objective of the Bill?

  • This Bill is to ensure reservations in teaching positions in central institutions for persons belonging to –
      1. Scheduled Castes
      2. Scheduled Tribes
      3. socially and educationally backward classes
      4. economically weaker sections
  • According to the HRD Ministry, there are more than 7,000 teaching jobs lying vacant in central educational institutions.
  • This Bill is aimed at filling those vacancies.
  • It also serves the purpose of fulfilling the demands of people from the above sections, for their rights as mentioned in the Constitution.

What are the key provisions?

  • Coverage and exceptions - The Bill will apply to ‘central educational institutions’ which include -
      1. universities set up by Acts of Parliament
      2. institutions deemed to be a university
      3. institutions of national importance
      4. institutions receiving aid from the central government
  • However, it excludes certain institutions of excellence, research institutions, and institutions of national and strategic importance.
  • E.g. Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, etc.
  • It also excludes minority education institutions.  
  • Reservation of posts - The Bill provides for reservation of posts in direct recruitment of teachers (out of the sanctioned strength).
  • [Direct recruitment takes place by inviting applications from those eligible to teach in a Central institution, as against public advertisement.]
  • For the purpose of such reservation, a central educational institution will be regarded as one unit.
  • So, allocation of teaching posts for reserved categories would be done on the basis of all positions of the same level (such as assistant professor) across departments.
  • [Under previous guidelines, each department was regarded as an individual unit for the purpose of reservation.]

What is the rationale?

  • The High Court noted that institution-wise reservation would result in some departments having only reservation beneficiaries and others only those from the open category.
  • While this is agreeable, having department as the unit too would mean that smaller faculties do not have any reservation.
  • In this, it needs 14 posts to accommodate SC and ST candidates, as their turn would come only at the seventh and 14th vacancy.
  • There may be no vacancies in many departments for many years, with none from the reserved categories for decades.
  • So, the narrower basis (department-wise) would mean fewer aspirants from OBC and SC/ST sections being recruited as assistant professors.
  • Instead, taking the institution as the unit would give more opportunities for these sections.
  • In other words, in a wider pool of posts, the quotas of 27% for OBC, 15% for SC and 7.5% for ST could be effectively applied.

How will it benefit?

  • According to the UGC’s annual report for 2017-18, nearly two-thirds of assistant professors in Central universities are from the general category.
  • Their representation would go up further, as the present Bill also applies the 10% quota for the economically weak among the general category.
  • Given this, applying the court’s department-wise roster norm would have deepened the sense of deprivation of the backward classes and SC/ST communities.
  • In this light, the Bill provides a welcome relief for aspirants from the disadvantaged sections of society.
  • Restoring the earlier system would serve a vital social purpose and ensure social justice in teachers’ reservation.

 

Source: PRS India, The Hindu

Related News: Teachers’ quota in Universities

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

sidetext
Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme
sidetext