0.2160
7667766266
x

Contract Enforcement in India - Ease Of Doing Business Ranking

iasparliament Logo
February 06, 2018

What is the issue?

  • India ranked 100 out of 190 countries in the World Bank's Ease of Doing Business report 2018.
  • Despite this being an improvement of 30 places, the low performance on sub-index of ‘enforcing contracts’ needs attention.

How is contract enforcement in India?

  • The WB's ease of doing business ranking is based on the average of 10 sub-indices, 'enforcing contracts' being one among them.
  • India’s ranking in the ‘enforcement of contract’ component is 164 out of total 190 economies in the index.
  • The reports' projections on improvement in India's ‘enforcing contracts’ score is also feeble, indicating the dismal performance.
  • This ranking is directly dependent on a country’s ability to provide an effective dispute resolution system.
  • The report says that it takes an average of nearly 4 years to enforce a contract in India.
  • The all-told cost to a litigant to recover amounts legitimately due to him/her is 31% of the value of the claim.

What was the legislation in this regard?

  • The Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act was passed.
  • This was primarily to address the dispute resolution concerns in India’s business environment.
  • It provides a forum with upgraded infrastructure to resolve those classified based on a specific value as “commercial disputes”.
  • The value specified ensures that the courts are not burdened with small claims.
  • It paves way for setting up commercial courts at the district level.
  • And also a commercial division in High Courts that have original jurisdiction.
  • This will be along with a commercial appellate division in the High Courts to hear appeals arising under the Act.
  • The Act requires the State governments to establish the required infrastructural facilities, in consultation with the HCs.
  • They are also required to establish facilities for training of judges who may be appointed to these courts.
  • It mandates the High Courts to show the levels of disposal of such claims on their website, thereby ensuring transparency.

What are the concerns?

  • There is generally a gap in enforcement when the implementation is left to State governments.
  • The Act contemplates the “appointment” of commercial court judges in districts.
  • However, most State governments have merely vested the presiding district judge with powers to act as a commercial court.
  • The principal district judges are already overburdened with workload.
  • Given this, vesting them with the powers of commercial courts in districts defeats the very intent and purpose of the Act.
  • The presiding judges' experience in dealing with commercial disputes is also doubtful.
  • Also, the implementation of institutional and infrastructural mandates specified to the States is largely lacking.
  • Addressing these shortfalls is essential to make the commercial courts truly business-like.
  • As also to make meaningful the commercial disputes Act to improve India’s ranking in “enforcing contracts”.

 

Source: The Hindu

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

sidetext
Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme
sidetext