0.2051
7667766266
x

Creamy Layer in SC/ST Promotions

iasparliament Logo
October 04, 2018

Click here to know more about the judgment on Reservation in Promotion.

What is the issue?

The Supreme Court's recent ruling, approving creamy layer concept to SC/ST promotions, has some concerns in terms of equality and career growth.

What is the change made?

  • The 2006 verdict on Nagaraj vs Union of India brought in a creamy layer filter for promotions for SC/ST employees.
  • Also, the state had to collect 'quantifiable data on backwardness' of the SC/ST class if it wished to provide reservation in promotions.
  • Correcting only the second anomaly, the court has now held that the government need not collect quantifiable data to demonstrate backwardness of SC/STs.
  • But when it comes to promotion of SC/ST employees, the court held that the creamy layer concept does apply.
  • So now, only in direct recruitment of the SC/STs, the creamy layer concept does not apply.
  • However, the state governments have the discretion to invoke Articles 16 (4A) and 16 (4B).
  • This is to provide for reservations in promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes with consequential seniority.
  • "Consequential seniority" refers to promotions made purely on reservation basis despite another person waiting for promotion being actually senior to him/her.

What are the concerns?

  • Against Precedence - It has been clearly stated in Indra Sawhney (1992) case, that any discussion on creamy layer “has no relevance” in the context of SC/STs.
  • Representation - Going by the creamy layer ceiling of Rs 8 lakh per annum, even “Group D” functionaries will come under the definition of creamy layer.
  • But notably, the SC/STs lack representation mainly at the Group A level which do not have direct recruitment provisions.
  • Promotions are the way through which members of SC/ST communities make it to this level.
  • So the consequence of the judgement will be that promotions will stop even at the Group D and Group C levels.
  • Protection - The SC/STs are given job reservations not because they are poor but because they are excluded.
  • The Constitution made the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as a separate category of subjects to protect them from caste aggression.
  • It was also to help them gain the strength they need to withstand it and to grow autonomously.
  • The first part of Article 335 stipulates job reservations for SC/STs as a right of representation, not as a welfare measure.
  • However, the creamy layer among SC/ST employees helps fulfil the second part of Article 335 that requires maintaining the “efficiency of administration”.
  • So the recent judgement largely undoes the affirmative action of ensuring equality of opportunity.
  • Right to opt out - The court also failed to address this, as at present, an SC/ST candidate does not have the right to reject reservations.
  • It is also a punishable offence to withhold one’s caste status while seeking government employment.
  • But allowing SC/ST candidates to compete in the general category would help thousands to leave the space for the less privileged among them.
  • Also, by competing as non-reserved candidates, the well-qualified SC/ST group would corner a substantial number of open posts.
  • So theoretically, SC/STs would end up garnering more posts than at present.

 

Source: The Hindu, Scroll

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

sidetext
Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme
sidetext