0.2728
7667766266
x

Flaws in our Defence Procurement Policies

iasparliament Logo
January 09, 2018

What is the issue?

  • The government has scrapped a 13-year-long procurement process for the 12 minesweepers warships, which are of critical importance.
  • There were also multiple other such unplanned high profile cancellation in the defence sector.

What are some cancellations?

  • Minesweeper Warships - These are vessels that are specialised to diffuse or safely remove explode underwater mines that target ships. 
  • For years, the navy has been adjusting its operations with just six outdated Soviet-era minesweepers, of which two retired last year.
  • The current cancellation leaves a glaring hole in India’s maritime security until a new vendor is contracted, which might even take more than a decade. 
  • MMRCA Cancellation - The cancellation of the tender for 126 “Medium multi-role combat aircraft” is another classical case.
  • This culmination in the unplanned procurement of 36 highly expensive Rafale fighters in flyaway condition from France’s “Dassault Aviation”.
  • Spike Anti-Tank Missile - The government recently cancelled the procurement of these missiles from the Israeli’s “Rafael Defence Systems”.
  • Black Shark Torpedoes –India’s first Scorpene submarine, INS Kalvari, was recently commissioned, but it didn’t have torpedoes (its primary weapon).
  • This was because of the cancellation of the contract for “Black Shark torpedoes” with Italian company “WASS”.
  • The cancellation was due to the corruption case involving “VVIP chopper” sales to India by Augusta Westland, which is a ‘sister concern’ of WASS.  

Why do so many procurements fail?

  • Ambitious Requirements - the primary one is the flawed framing of qualitative requirements (QRs) or the performance criteria the weapon.
  • Too often, the user services (Army, Navy and Air force) tend to set very high standards in order to get the latest equipment.
  • Also, this trend is partly due to the certainty of the slow pace of procurement, as equipments would arrive late and technologies would’ve advanced. 
  • Consequently, requirements become very technologically ambitious, that either just one or none of the potential suppliers would be able to meet them.
  • Since bureaucrats desire at least two eligible contenders for “price discovery”, this creates a stalemate situation.
  • Unrealistic Demands – This was felt in the MMRCA cancellation, when “Dassault Aviation” wasn’t willing to enter technology transfer arrangements.
  • Also, the timelines for delivery and other accessory conditions became prohibitive for the deal to proceed.
  • The Missing Element - Simplification of the procurement process has been repeatedly promised in the past but hasn’t happened.
  • Also, there is a lack of bureaucrats who know their subject and do not fear the possibility of subsequent investigation.

 

Source: Business Standard

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

sidetext
Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme
sidetext