Assessment of the Civil Service - Selection and Training
iasparliament
June 20, 2019
What is the issue?
Senior civil servants assume leadership positions right after they join, but the testing criteria is far from assessing the skill required for the role.
In this context, here is an assessment of the priorities and challenges in the civil services at the selection and training phases.
What are the present drawbacks?
There has so far been no concerted or sustained effort to manage senior civil service in a comprehensive manner.
The steps have been only ad hoc in nature; the lateral recruitment is also one such effort.
What really needs to be done is to look at -
the manner in which recruitment takes place
the in-service training, transfers, assessment of officers
incentives and disincentives
What should the selection priorities be?
Almost all the IAS officers occupy leadership positions right from the beginning of their careers.
Even in the Secretariat jobs, each officer has to lead a team.
Hence, the objective should be to select such persons who have leadership qualities or have the potential to become leaders.
A leader, in this context, has to be able to build a team and carry it along with her/him by motivating those working with him.
S/he has to excel in communication skills beyond the written one.
S/he has to be ethical in behaviour with a positive attitude.
How is the selection at present?
Most of the above requirements are not tested at the time of recruitment.
The entrance exams primarily select brilliant individuals by testing written communication skills, some analytical skills and general awareness.
It tests the examinees capability to “crack” the exam, and various coaching institutes assist them in doing so.
But a leader requires much more than that.
What is to be done?
Recruitment - The tools to assess the above discussed skills which are in use in the private sector and elsewhere in the world should be adopted.
Training - The officers have knowledge and they are capable of acquiring more of it.
What is required is the transformation of attitude as an officer, the necessity and utility of ethical behaviour.
Given the high maximum age of entry into the civil service, this process becomes difficult and challenging.
In this line, the training should be centered around inculcating leadership skills.
It has to be focused on imparting skills and attitude that would enable the officer to evolve as a leader.
Periodic upgradation of skills and learning from each other should be the focus of in-service training.
This is imperative in the context of a fast-changing world both in terms of technology and management.
Certainty - The inclination and aptitude of the officer needs to be monitored to determine his/her postings and assignments.
Once assigned a task, he/she should be left to deliver.
Frequent transfers interrupt the implementation process and leaves way for politicisation of bureaucracy.
An agency, like the UPSC, can be assigned to prepare a panel from which the government can select an officer.
Are there concerns on this type of selection. Is there a scientific method for this kind of selection process or is this based on the individual selector perspective?