0.2183
7667766266
x

Impeachment of High Court Judge

iasparliament Logo
December 12, 2024

Why in news?

The Opposition INDIA bloc parties in Rajya Sabha are preparing to give notice to move a motion to impeach Allahabad High Court judge Justice for his remarks at an event organized by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad last week.

Why is the opposition planning to move a motion for impeachment?

  • Allegations of judicial misconduct – Remarks at the Vishwa Hindu Parishad event were reportedly inflammatory and targeted on minority communities.
  • Breach of judicial code of conduct – Judges are expected to refrain from making public statements or engaging in activities that could compromise their neutrality or reflect personal biases.
  • Perception of partiality – Statements favoring specific ideologies can create a perception of bias, especially when the judge is tasked with ruling on matters of public or constitutional significance.
  • Undermining judicial integrity – When a judge publicly aligns with political or ideological stances, it risks blurring the separation between judiciary and politics.
  • The Opposition argues that initiating this process is essential to ensure that judges adhere to the highest ethical standards.

What are the constitutional provisions for high court judges?

  • Establishment and Composition – Article 214 establishes a High Court for each state or a group of states.
  • Article 216 provides the composition of the High Court, including the Chief Justice and other judges as deemed necessary.
  • Article 217 – Deals with the appointment, qualifications, conditions of office, and tenure of High Court judges.
  • Appointment – The President appoints High Court Judges in consultation with the following:
    • Chief Justice of India,
    • Governor of the State,
    • Chief Justice of the High Court.
  • Qualifications – Must be an Indian citizen  and,
    • Have at least 10 years of experience as an advocate of a High Court of India,
    • Have at least 10 years of experience as a judicial officer.
  • Tenure – High court judges serve until the age of 62 unless impeached.
  • Removal – Article 124(4) specifies grounds for removal, including "proved misbehavior" or "incapacity."
  • Article 218 applies provisions of Article 124, clauses (4) and (5), to High Courts.
  • These provisions detail the process for removing a Supreme Court judge, including an inquiry and a two-thirds majority vote in Parliament.
  • Article 218 applies equally to High Court and Supreme Court judges.
  • Article 215 – Gives every High Court the power to punish for contempt of itself.
  • Article 50 – States that the state must take steps to separate the judiciary from the executive in the public services of the state.
  • Article 221 – Provides for the salaries and allowances of High Court judges, ensuring they cannot be reduced during their term except during a financial emergency.

What are the roles and responsibilities of a judge?

  • Delivering justice – A judge must ensure fair and unbiased adjudication based on facts, evidence, and the law.
    • Upholding constitutional morality and the rule of law is a key responsibility.
  • Interpreting and applying laws Judges interpret statutory and constitutional provisions to address legal disputes.
    • Their rulings often create precedents, shaping the legal framework of the country.
  • Protecting fundamental rights Judges act as custodians of citizens’ fundamental rights, often intervening when these rights are violated.
  • Maintaining judicial integrity They must conduct themselves in a manner that reinforces public confidence in the judiciary, avoiding controversies or conflicts of interest.

What is the procedure for impeachment of judges?

  • While the Constitution does not use the word ‘impeachment’, it is colloquially used to refer to the proceedings under Article 218 Article 124(4).
  • The procedure for removal of judges is elaborated in the Judges Inquiry Act, 1968.
  • Initiation of the motion – Requires at least 100 members’ signatures in Lok Sabha or 50 members in Rajya Sabha.
    • This motion is then submitted to the Speaker (Lok Sabha) or the Chairman (Rajya Sabha).
    • Based on this, he or she may decide to either admit the motion or refuse to admit it.
  • Formation of an inquiry committee – If the motion is admitted, a three-member committee is constituted by the presiding officer. The committee includes:
    • Chief Justice of India or a Supreme Court judge.
    • A High Court Chief Justice.
    • A distinguished jurist nominated by the Speaker/Chairman.
  • Committee’s role – The committee investigates the allegations and frames charges against the judge.
  • If the judge is found guilty, the report is submitted and takes up for debate in the House where the motion is originated and if found not guilty, the process ends.
  • Parliamentary voting – For removal, both Houses must approve the motion with:
    • A majority of the total membership  and
    • A two-thirds majority of members present and voting.
  • Presidential approval – Following approval by Parliament, the President issues an order for the judge’s removal.

What are the instances of impeachment?

  • While no judge has been successfully impeached so far in India’s but there are many instance impeachment motions are initiated in the parliament.

Instance

Remarks

Justice V. Ramaswami (1993) – Charged with financial impropriety.

Despite evidence, the motion failed as some MPs abstained from voting, and he retired later.

Justice Soumitra Sen (2011) – Accused of misappropriating funds as a court-appointed receiver.

Resigned after the Rajya Sabha passed the motion but before Lok Sabha debated it.

Justice Gangele (2015) – Alleged to have sexually harassed a woman judge.

Cleared by the inquiry committee.

Justice Pardiwala (2015) – Faced impeachment for controversial remarks on reservations.

Dropped after he expunged the remarks from his judgment.

 

Justice Nagarjuna (2017) – Accused of victimizing a Dalit judge and financial impropriety

The motion fell short of required signatures as some MPs withdrew their names.

CJI Dipak Misra (2018) – Faced accusations of judicial impropriety and political bias.

The motion was dismissed by the Rajya Sabha Chairman at the preliminary stage.

What lies ahead?

  • Ensuring a fair inquiry is critical to balance judicial independence with accountability.
  • Strengthen internal ethics committees within the judiciary.
  • The controversy highlights the need for judges to remain impartial and avoid engaging in any activity that might cast doubt on their neutrality.

References

  1. The Indian Express | Motion to Impeach Allahabad HC Judge
  2. PRS | Removal of Judges from Office

 

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

sidetext
Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme
sidetext