0.2142
7667766266
x

US Supreme Court Order on Gujarat Fishermen Case

iasparliament Logo
April 10, 2019

Why in news?

The US Supreme Court recently ruled in favour of a group of fishermen and a Gujarat village panchayat in a suit against the International Finance Corporation (IFC).

What is the power project in dispute?

  • The case relates to alleged pollution caused by a Gujarat-based power plant partly funded by the IFC.
  • It is a coal-fired power plant near Mundra port in Gujarat’s Kutch district, with a capacity of 4,150 MW.
  • It is the country’s first to deploy energy-efficient supercritical technology.
  • It results in 40.5% higher energy efficiency compared to other coal-based power technologies.
  • It was initially conceived by Power Finance Corporation Limited and awarded in 2007 to Coastal Gujarat Power Limited, a subsidiary of Tata Power.
  • It reached full generation capacity in March 2013 and since then, is selling power to utilities in Gujarat, Maharashtra, Haryana, Punjab and Rajasthan.
  • Funding - Of the estimated project cost of $4.14 billion, $450 million was funded in 2008 by IFC.
  • Other contributions include -
    1. Asian Development Bank - $450 million as loan
    2. Export Credit Agency of Korea - $800 million as loan
    3. CGPL - raised around Rs 1.5 billion from Indian banks through debt

What are the fishermen's concerns?

  • The company had first got clearance for a closed-cycle cooling system in the Mundra plant.
  • But it got government clearances modified and installed boilers with an open cooling system.
  • The plant thus operates a cooling technology that requires three times more water than the system it got clearance for.
  • Reportedly, the outfall canal of the plant discharges hot and saline water at a rate of 600 million litres/hr into the sea.
  • The complainants have alleged that it has affected marine life as well as groundwater sources.
  • With marine life near the coast affected, fishermen are forced to sail farther in search of fish.
  • The company also dredged the coast and seafloor for their outfall channel.
  • It has also deposited sand near a well, a source of drinking water, and the water in the well has turned saline since.
  • Complainants add that coal dust and fly-ash from the plant are damaging date palms and chikoo trees.

Who filed the complaint?

  • The plant is located near Tragadi village in Mandvi taluka, and Navinal village in neighbouring Mundra taluka in Gujarat.
  • Tragadi has a colony of fishermen in an area known as Tragadi-Nal while Navinal is rich in agriculture and horticulture.
  • In 2010, Tragadi fishermen and Navinal residents came together under the aegis of fishermen’s organisation Machimar Adhikhar Sangharsh Sanghathan (MASS).
  • They complained to the company about the damage caused to the environment.
  • The fishermen demanded that the plant switch to the closed-cycle cooling system, but the company refused.

What happened then?  

  • In 2015, a suit was filed through EarthRights International against IFC in the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia.
  • They contended that the funding agency should be held responsible for air, land and water pollution caused by the plant.
  • Arguing that the IFC internal audit had found environmental violations, they sought damages and injunctive relief.
  • But IFC claimed absolute immunity from such litigation under the US International Organisation Immunities Act (IOIA), 1945.
  • [IOIA grants international organisations such as the World Bank and the WHO the same immunity from suit as foreign governments enjoy.]
  • The district court ruled in IFC’s favour, and on challenge, the Court of Appeals for the district also upheld it.

What is the current verdict?

  • Later, on challenge, the US Supreme Court reversed the Appeals Court judgment.
  • The court held that IFC's claim for absolute immunity from the suit filed is not valid.
  • It ruled that IFC enjoyed only “restrictive immunity” in activities abroad.
  • It also remanded the matter back to the lower court for adjudication on damages. The case has now gone back to the US district court.

 

Source: The Indian Express

Quick Fact

International Finance Corporation

  • IFC is a sister organization of the World Bank and member of the World Bank Group.
  • It is the largest global development institution focused exclusively on financing private-sector development projects in poor and developing countries.
  • It offers financial resources, technical expertise, global experience, and innovative thinking to help its clients overcome financial, operational, and other challenges.
Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

sidetext
Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme
sidetext