0.2064
7667766266
x

RBI’s Conflict of Interest

iasparliament Logo
August 24, 2018

What is the issue?

  • Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI’s) has asked the government for removing its nominees from the Public Sector Bank’s boards.
  • While this is part of the good governance reforms, the union government has refused to concede the same, which is unfortunate.

What does the RBI need?

  • RBI has been repeatedly asking the finance ministry to allow the central bank to distance itself from the boards to avoid a clear conflict of interest.
  • This is a long standing articulated by multiple ‘RBI Governors’ as it feels that its presence in the boards is hindering its regulatory role.
  • Way back in the 1990s, the Narasimham committee on banking sector reforms had recommended that the RBI should give up its seats on the board.
  • Further, in 2014, P J Nayak committee, on governance of bank boards, argued in favour of withdrawal of RBI nominees from PSB boards.
  • Notably, the Nayak committee favoured a phased shift from the current, by slowly increasing the capacity of bank boards to take decisions.

What is the government’s stand?

  • Government recently rejected RBI’s demand in this regard.
  • As PSBs have over the past few years, accumulated massive non-performing assets (NPAs), the government seems to be towing with caution.
  • It seems to believe that without the presence of an RBI nominee, PSB boards may make more mistakes at this critical juncture.
  • While banks have been criticised sternly for having taken imprudent decisions, the RBI too, has been criticised for failing to supervise the PSBs.
  • But the RBI feels that it has been handicapped by regulations as it is essentially part of both the decision-making process as well as supervision.
  • Notably, profits of PSBs have nosedived lately because of the RBI’s insistence on more transparent recognition and provisioning of NPAs.

What is the way ahead?

  • The government seems to be confused on the RBI’s unambiguous stand that it can involved in the bank’s board and act as a regulator. 
  • Going by government’s current stand, regulators in other domains should also have their nominees on the boards of PSU companies they supervise. 
  • As this is absurd and the government must reconsider this, and bring about the legislative change that is required.

 

Source: Business Standard

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

sidetext
Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme
sidetext