0.2158
7667766266
x

The Collegium’s Role

iasparliament Logo
September 24, 2019

What is the issue?

  • The Supreme Court (SC) Collegium has modified its recommendation concerning Justice A.A. Kureshi’s appointment.
  • This episode creates the image that the Collegium could have succumbed to pressure from the Union government.

What happened?

  • Collegium - Initially, its resolution was to appoint the senior judge as the Chief Justice of the Madhya Pradesh High Court (HC).
  • But now it has modified its resolution and decided to send him to the Tripura High Court.
  • Central government - Hesitant to elevate the Justice Kureshi, who is from the Gujarat HC, but serving in the Bombay HC on transfer.
  • The government didn’t act on the recommendation which raised the suspicion that it was blocking his appointment.
  • The Collegium modified its decision after considering letters from the Department of Justice and accompanying material.

Why it is unclear whether the controversy has ended?

  • It is possible that the Collegium and the Centre have arrived at a compromise.
  • Based on this, the government drops its opposition to his appointment as Chief Justice on the condition that he is sent to a smaller HC.
  • However, until his appointment as head of the Tripura HC is notified, there will be a lurking doubt on whether the latest resolution is in line with the Centre’s approval.
  • Under the current procedure,
    1. The Collegium may reconsider a recommendation,
    2. The government is bound to implement the reiterated decision.

What created an image that both the sides are guilty?

  • It is acceptable if the Collegium and the government resolve their differences through consultation and correspondence.
  • But the final decision shouldn’t be opaque, mysterious and indicative of executive pressure.
  • It could be said that the Collegium and the government, in the case of lack of transparency are equally guilty.
  • If the Law Ministry had a bona-fide objection to Justice Kureshi, it could have disclosed its opinion on his suitability.
  • The failure to do so created a public imagination that the ruling party is blocking his elevation because of judicial orders he had passed.
  • As for the Collegium, it is unclear why it couldn’t have disclosed what the government had wanted in its communications.

How can the credibility deficit be bridged?

  • This episode makes a dent in the narrative that the Collegium system is a shield against executive interference in the judicial appointments.
  • The two sides can come up with fresh clauses in the existing procedure of appointments under which,
    1. The Collegium’s decisions are implemented within a time-frame,
    2. The Government’s objections and reservations are made public.
  • The Collegium system is in need of urgent remedy to rectify its flaws.

 

Source: The Hindu

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

sidetext
Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme
sidetext