0.2372
7667766266
x

06/12/2019 - Government Policies

iasparliament Logo
December 06, 2019

Is the new Seeds Bill tilted against farmers’ interests and biased in favour of seed companies? Analyse (200 Words)

Refer - The Hindu

Enrich the answer from other sources, if the question demands.

5 comments
Login or Register to Post Comments

IAS Parliament 5 years

KEY POINTS

·        According to the government, a new Seeds Bill is necessary to enhance seed replacement rates in Indian agriculture, specify standards for registration of seed varieties and enforce registration from seed producers to seed retailers.

·        While these goals are indeed worthy, any such legislation is expected to be in alignment with the spirit of the PPVFR Act.

·        For instance, a shift from farm-saved seeds to certified seeds, which would raise seed replacement rates, is desirable. Certified seeds have higher and more stable yields than farm-saved seeds.

Problematic provisions

·        The Seeds Bill insists on compulsory registration of seeds. However, the PPVFR Act was based on voluntary registration.

·        Seeds Bill, demands no such information while registering a new variety. As a result, an important method of recording the contributions of farmers is overlooked and private companies are left free to claim a derived variety as their own.

·        The Seeds Bill is not based on an IPR like breeder’s rights, private seed companies can re-register their seeds an infinite number of times after the validity period. Given this “ever-greening” provision, many seed varieties may never enter the open domain for free use.

·        The disputes on compensation have to be decided as per the Consumer Protection Act 1986. Consumer courts are hardly ideal and friendly institutions that farmers can approach.

·        According to the Seeds Bill, farmers become eligible for compensation if a plant variety fails to give expected results under “given conditions”.

·        “Given conditions” is almost impossible to define in agriculture. Seed companies would always claim that “given conditions” were not ensured, which will be difficult to be disputed with evidence in a consumer court.

The way ahead

·        The private sector, thus, has a natural incentive to focus on hybrids. In such a world of hybrids, even progressive seed laws become a weak defence.

·        Strong public agricultural research systems ensure that the choices between hybrids, varieties and farm-saved seeds remain open, and are not based on private profit concerns. 

Manojkumar B 5 years

Kindly review

IAS Parliament 5 years

Good attempt. Keep Writing.

Chinna 5 years

Kindly review...thank you...

IAS Parliament 5 years

Good answer. Information about PPVR act is not need. Keep Writing.

Vendhan 5 years

Tk

IAS Parliament 5 years

Good  attempt. Keep Writing. 

Abhilasha 5 years

Please review it.

IAS Parliament 5 years

Good attempt. Keep Writing.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE - MAINSTORMING

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme
sidetext