0.3088
7667766266
x

08/08/2020 - Environment

iasparliament Logo
August 08, 2020

Do you think that the recently published Environment Impact Assessment draft needs a comprehensive relook? Examine  (200 Words)

Refer - Business Line

Enrich the answer from other sources, if the question demands.

 

5 comments
Login or Register to Post Comments

IAS Parliament 4 years

KEY POINTS

In the controversial Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) 2020 draft notification, published in March, the Ministry of Environment, Forests, and Climate Change sets out a process (Clause 22: “Dealing of Violations”) for post-hoc legalisation of projects that start construction and/or operation prior to receiving an environmental clearance.

EIA regulatory violations

·         In the context of the industrialisation-led economic development model, at the heart of the contestation is the question of what constitutes an appropriate trade-off between industrial development and environmental protection.

·         Dealing with projects that fail to obtain prior clearance has been a difficult issue for the regulator, since the project proponents could cite sunk investments if the penalty for violation involves shutting down the project.

·         On the other hand, post-hoc legalisation of such violations could lead to perverse incentives for the industry, rendering the entire regulation redundant.

Legalisation process

·         Further, according to Clause 22, only the violators themselves or a regulatory or governmental authority can bring the violation to notice. It is not clear from the notification if any other stakeholders, for example interested individuals or civil society organisations, have a legal basis to report violations.

Multi-stakeholder deliberation

·         The complexity involved in just one clause highlighted here is an indication of the need for a wider and more meaningful deliberation on the entire draft notification, beyond simply eliciting public comments.

·         The report, made available in the public domain, recorded the deliberations of the stakeholder meetings and provided a rationale for its recommendations.

·         Researchers argue that such participatory processes are likely to generate greater legitimacy for the regulations, potentially reducing conflict during implementation.

·         Combined with research which finds that conflicts arising out of environmental and social issues impose real costs on businesses, it is important that the agencies adopt a more deliberative approach that takes into account various stakeholder views.

 

 



PRASHANT KUMAR 4 years

Pls Review Sir 

IAS Parliament 4 years

Good attempt. Keep Writing.

K. V. A 4 years

Pls review

IAS Parliament 4 years

Good attempt. Keep Writing.

Cibi Siddharth 4 years

Please review

IAS Parliament 4 years

Good attempt. Keep Writing.

Aradhana Tiwari 4 years

The Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has recently proposed a new "Draft Notification of the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA)" to amend the "EIA Notification 2006" -  with an aim to increase the production and availability of a few drugs.

              EIA is a process that assesses the effect of a newly proposed industrial or infrastructural projects on the environment. The EIA prevents the approval and initiation of any project without proper supervision. It is statutorily backed by the 'Environment Protection Act, 1986'. 

Though the EIA draft,2020  introduces some changes to ramp up the drug production, many have cited that it needs a "comprehensive relook for various reasons".

- Clearance Post-facto : The new draft allows for post-facto approval for projects. It means that the clearances for projects can be awarded even if they have started construction or have been running phase without securing environmental clearances.

                This is the violation of the “precautionary principle,” which is a principle of environmental sustainability.

- Public Consultation Process : The draft notification provides for a reduction of the time period from 30 days to 20 days for the public to submit their responses during a public hearing for any application seeking environmental clearance.

- Exemption of projects by categorising projects as “strategic.” : Polluting industries like soda-ash, acids, petroleum and petrochemical products, dyes, biomedical waste, treatment plants, synthetics, paints, chemical fertilizers, pesticides and construction industries – all of which pose threats to human health – will be exempted from the public clearance process. 

                It means, the provision widen the escape route for violators or environmental regulations, due to which, there are incidents like - "the gas leak at the LG Polymers plant in Visakhapatnam". 

- Exemption to Construction Projects up to 150,000 sq m: The Draft also exempts up to 150,000 sq. m. construction projects(instead of the existing 20,000 sq. m.)  from the assessment. These projects can now gain environment clearance after scrutiny by state-level expert appraisal committee. 

>>> Way forward :

- Grow now, sustain later should not be the policy, as the notion is dangerously tilted against the concept of sustainable development.

- In order to improve ease of doing business, the govt should bring down the average delay of 238 days in granting environmental clearance, that emanates from bureaucratic delays and complex laws.

IAS Parliament 4 years

Good attempt. Keep Writing.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE - MAINSTORMING

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme
sidetext