Critically examine the systemic issues that ailing India’s Public Sector Banks (PSBs) and suggest measures to improve the efficiency of PSB’s. (200 words)
Refer – The Financial Express
Enrich the answer from other sources, if the question demands.
IAS Parliament 7 years
KEY POINTS
Issues ailing PSBs
· Lack of detailed financial reporting – The first sign of poor corporate governance is the personal use of corporate assets by promoters and/or executives.
· From the abridged reporting requirements currently existed, it is difficult to identify any such preferential use.
· Lack of accountability of independent directors – Independent directors can only be implicated for offences committed with their knowledge, attributable through board processes, connivance or negligence.
· This lack of accountability is the reason behind the limited impact independent directors has had on the boards.
· Inadequate PSB board engagement – As required by law, the boards of PSBs meet four times a year.
· But given that, PSBs are facing exceptional challenges, these minimal engagements are not enough.
· Conflict of Interest – Board members often sitting on several other boards.
· However, this, in itself, is a major fault line as it can result in board interlock or conflict of interest.
· Lack of customer-centricity – Retail customers are a consistent source of profits for PSBs.
· But they have now started to prefer private sector banks; the reason is poor customer service.
· While all PSBs have committees to address concerns of shareholders and staff, there is a lack of focus at the board level on customer interests, experience, grievances.
· Lack of transparency in key appointments – The government set up the Banks Board Bureau (BBB) as an autonomous body for recommending appointments of senior officials in PSBs.
· But since the members of BBB are appointed by the government, it still does not completely eliminate the possibility of government intervention.
Measures to improve efficiency
· Detailed financial disclosures – It will allow all the NPAs to be tracked since there will be accountability, and informed lenders and shareholders will raise questions if funds are diverted fraudulently.
· Make Independent directors accountable – To protect interests of lenders and shareholders, there is an urgent need to make independent directors’ accountability at par with rest of the board members.
· Improve board engagement – The Uday Kotak Committee recommended it to be enhanced to five times a year.
· But, given that PSBs are facing exceptional challenges, it should go beyond the requirements and meet at least six times a year.
· Prohibit single member participation in multiple boards – Given the impact of PSBs on the economy, an exception should be made under the Companies Act to prohibit PSB board members to take up any other board membership.
· Customer centric measures – To stay competitive, PSBs must set up a customer relationship committee at the board level to drive the message of customer service and customer centricity across banks.
· Ensure transparency - To ensure transparency, there should be a collegium comprising of equal number of members from both the government and the opposition to recommend the board members.