What is a Bad Bank? Should they be a possible solution to India’s NPA crisis? Discuss (200 words)
Refer – The Hindu
Enrich the answer from other sources, if the question demands.
IAS Parliament 6 years
KEY POINTS
Bad Bank
· A bad bank is one, set up to buy the bad loans of another bank with significant nonperforming assets.
· By transferring such assets to the bad bank, the original institution may clear its balance sheet.
· It would take on public sector banks’ chronic bad loans and focus on their resolution and the extraction of any residual value from the underlying asset.
· Technically, a bad bank is said to be an Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC) or Asset Management Company (AMC).
“For” arguments –
· Hiving off stressed loan accounts to a bad bank would free public sector bank balance sheets from their deleterious impact and improve their financial position.
· This would allow government-owned banks to focus on their core operations of providing credit for fresh investments and economic activity.
· If managed well, a bad bank can clean up bank balance sheets and get them to start lending again to businesses.
“Against” arguments
· This approach would simply shift the soured debt from banks to another firm.
· It is difficult to devise a transparent method, free from political interference and conflict of interest, for identifying the assets to be moved.
· It will not address the more serious corporate governance issues plaguing public sector banks that led to the NPA problem in the first place.
· This concept may not be relevant for India since much of the assets backing the banks’ loans are viable or can be made viable.
· E.g. a large chunk of projects stalled due to extraneous factors like problems in land acquisition or environmental clearance.
· They just need restructuring and additional funding.
· There are issues with respect to composition and management of the Bad Bank.
· A majority stakes with government would render the Bad Bank with the same issues of governance and capitalization as PSBs.
· On the other hand, a private majority shareholding could invite criticism of favouritism and corruption if the loans are not priced appropriately when transferred to a ‘bad bank’.