0.2206
7667766266
x

Economy

iasparliament Logo
October 22, 2018

Recently, an Inter-ministerial committee on payments & settlement system has recommended creating a separate regulator for the payments systems in India instead of the present in charge, RBI. Discuss how far such suggestions are valid? (200 words)

Refer – Business Standard

Enrich the answer from other sources, if the question demands.

3 comments
Login or Register to Post Comments

IAS Parliament 6 years

KEY POINTS

Rationale behind the decision

·         The aim is to foster competition and consumer protection, systemic stability and resilience in the payments sector.

·         Technology – Payments and settlement system is a new sector where technology is bringing about rapid changes.

·         So, it requires a team of subject experts working independently of RBI.

·         Because, working under the established RBI framework could inhibit innovation and competition.

·         Overburden – RBI is already burdened with a wide array of regulatory work.

·         There were concerns about the ability of RBI to provide the light as well as quick regulatory touch that a new and evolving sector such as payment services deserves.

Concerns with the new regulator

·         There is a definite overlapping of the current regulatory powers of the RBI and the proposed regulations for the payments industry.

·         Payment systems are a sub-set of currency, which is regulated by the RBI.

·         Similarly, all payment systems have an underlying bank account, which again is regulated by the banking regulator, i.e. the RBI.

·         In this scenario, taking regulation away from the RBI could create confusion.

·         Also, it would be odd to have two different entities regulating what is essentially one continuous function.

·         A similar problem will arise for card-based payments, which are issued by banks but can come under dual regulation.

·         Also, there is an overarching impact of monetary policy on payment and settlement systems and vice-versa.

·         This adds validity to the idea that regulation of payment systems remain with the monetary authority i.e. the RBI.

·         Further, there is a risk that a brand new regulator may be unable to match the expertise of the RBI in carrying out regulatory duties.

·         Keeping the RBI out of the loop would also defy established international practice.

Road to future

·         The key to resolving such problem lies in the understanding that, Payments systems need integrated regulation not coordinated regulation.

·         Meanwhile, RBI has also shown its willingness to changes, provided the overall leadership stays with it.

·          A unified regulator can thus help lower the regulatory compliance costs and enable the seamless implementation of rules.

Manav 6 years

Kindly review it. Thanks. 

IAS Parliament 6 years

Try to discuss the reasons that justifies such a regulator like overburden of RBI, ability of RBI in dealing a sector which requires huge technological expertise and then discuss the problems with such regulator. Keep writing.

Sahitya 6 years

Please review 

IAS Parliament 6 years

Try to discuss the rationale for a separate regulator and examine the problems in such decision. Keep writing.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE - MAINSTORMING

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme
sidetext