The recent ordinance on criminalising instant triple talaq is neither perfect nor necessary. Discuss (200 words)
Refer – The Hindu
Enrich the answer from other sources, if the question demands.
IAS Parliament 6 years
KEY POINTS
· The central government has recently passed an Ordinance making talaq-e-biddat (or) instant triple talaq a criminal offence.
· It makes all forms of declaration of instant talaq to be void.
· Also, Instant triple talaq will now attract a maximum jail term of three years.
Issues with the ordinance
· The Supreme Court has already set aside instant triple talaq in Shayara Bano case (2017).
· Under this, a Muslim man can no longer use it to cause ‘harm’ to his wife.
· After rendering talaq-e-biddat inoperative, considering it a cognisable and non-bailable offence seems illogical.
· Thus, imprisonment of 3 years for triple talaq is excessive, arbitrary, irrational and thus violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
· Also the core issue still remains – whether a marital wrong, essentially a civil matter, should lead to prosecutions and jail terms.
Concerns with the Ordinance route
· The Lok Sabha has passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017.
· The Bill seeks to give statutory form to the Supreme Court ruling of 2017.
· But, it is pending in the Rajya Sabha due to lack of consensus driven by some controversial provisions.
· At this juncture, the use of ordinance route lends credence to accusations that the legislature was undemocratically circumvented to serve the political interests.
· Article 123 empowers the President to promulgate an ordinance only when urgent situations arise during the recess of Parliament.
· In the case of triple talaq, no such emergency came to light.
· Mere lack of consensus in the Rajya Sabha is not a good enough reason to promulgate an ordinance.
Secret agent 6 years
Kindly review.
IAS Parliament 6 years